StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels" investigates that the democratic peace theory is widely misinterpreted, and this is largely attributed to cultural bias, or is limited to the Western cultural area that is relatively narrow…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.6% of users find it useful
Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels"

Does Democracy Promote Peace? Introduction Democracy is a system of government where the will of the people prevails in the selection of their rulers. Peace is widely regarded as the most critical global concern of the modern generation. It basically refers to the absence of war or violence that may harm people and cause destruction of property. The idea that liberal governments which are democratically elected can prevent war is perhaps the most influential and appealing idea of the modern era, but very controversial at the same time. The focus of this essay is on the proposition that democratically governed nations are bound to coexist peacefully with each other. Empirical evidence so far in support of the proposition that democratically governed nations have not instigated violence to resolve disputes among themselves is substantial. Despite the strength of statistical evidence established by specialists in the 1970s, there has been a fair share of criticism on this proposition, most of which has received substantially persuasive counterarguments from protagonists of the democratic peace proposition. The Democratic Peace Theory In democratic peace theory, it is argued that elected leaders are likely to be restrained by the populations. This implies that in democracies, people may not readily accept to bear the burden of war, in regard to loss of human life and the financial implications. Secondly, it is believed that domestic disputes are likely to be better resolved by use of political institutions (Baldwin, 1993). In the event of a conflict between different democracies, international institutions such as the United Nations and the G-8 summits are likely to be called upon to resolve such international disputes. Under the democratic peace theory, it is also believed that democratic governance breeds a culture of conciliation and negotiation, thereby undermining violence as a suitable means of resolving conflicts. In the event that a war-prone leader is democratically elected, institutions such as the congress will provide checks and balances that will prevent a head of state from leading a country into war and conflict with other nations. Finally, under democratic theory, it is believed that people are likely to be more tolerant and empathetic with other democracies. Thus, democracy is regarded to be an effective system that prevents conflict and war, either through institutional constraints, common norms, popular will or mutual respect. Political science scholars have in the past century held that the world would be more peaceful if more countries had democratically elected governments. As stated by Immanuel Kant in the essay “Perpetual Peace”, democratic countries are less warlike. Despite the essay having been cited overwhelmingly in the discourse concerning democracy as a vital prerequisite to peaceful coexistence among nations, Kant himself was however not an enthusiast of democracy. He instead proposed the use of civil institutions to establish republics as a more practical means of achieving peace among nations. According to Kant, a republic was a system of governance that that had respect for private property and ensured legal equality of its citizens, who should be regarded as subjects. There are several theoretical notions that are well developed in regard to relationships between democracies, most of which are complementary. An updated recount by Rummel (1997) provides an expansive theoretical defense of the proposition that democratic space actually serves as a significant pacifying force in international relations. In his recast, more emphasis is laid on the implications of public opinion in creation of democracies, the cross-pressures that are inherent in democratic societies, and the differences that often emerge in the political processes of both autocratic and democratic societies. In a theory advanced by Russet (2010), he lays emphasis on cultural and structural theoretical frameworks that support the democratic peace proposition. He recasts on propositions that are largely interrelated regarding the impact of the type of regime on international relations. In his structural framework, he discusses institutional constraints that result in peaceful conflict resolution. In the cultural framework, he lays more emphasis on the impact of normative and cultural restraints that influence collective bargaining and negotiation between democratic states. From reviews done regarding the democratic peace proposition, it is evident that normative explanations on this proposition have emerged to be more persuasive and coherent than structural explanations. Indeed more research has been undertaken on normative explanations than structural ones. Normative approaches have realized distinctive supportive evidence regarding types of regimes and factors that influence and enhance peaceful relations among democratic states. The idea of democracy promoting peace has been embraced by a majority of world leaders over time, with the United States being at the forefront of this advocacy. President Woodrow Wilson openly advocated for creation of a less confrontational world through creation and support of democratic governance across all nations. Based on his ideas and perspective on foreign policy, Wilson rose to become one of the most influential leaders especially after the First World War. The international relations discourse was essentially dominated by arguments advanced by Wilsons’s arguments (Friedman, 2000). These ideals did not last long, as they were overtaken by the events of the Second World War which gave rise to what is referred to in political science discourse as “realism” or “neorealism". Henry Kissinger, the most influential protagonist of realist ideals had an expansive perspective on the impact of Wilson’s arguments on the American political system and international relations. According to Kissinger, the American “exceptionalism” tradition was the brainchild of President Wilson, and was the origin of the United States foreign policy. As once said by Harry S. Truman, an imposition of a totalitarian regime on free peoples destabilized foundations of global peace thereby compromising the security of the United States. Indeed the United States strongly holds that international peace is largely determined and depended on establishment and promotion of strong democratic institutions. According to the American foreign policy that has had vast influence on international relations, democratically governed states do not rise up against each other in war, (Kissinger, 1994). Kissinger’s perspective is widely regarded in political and international relations discourse, but the reality is that the North American foreign policy is largely shaped by realism and neorealism” ideals. Oneal & Russet for instance, provide empirical evidence democratic states involved in international trade are likely a pacifying effect that effectively complements regime type. Additionally, Russet (2010) established that the existence of international organizations immensely contributes to peaceful relations between democratic states. In his report, Russet established that democratically governed states may inevitably be involved in disputes, but will more often than not employ conflict resolution mechanisms such as arbitration and mediation to resolve their disagreements. He goes further to point out that conflict resolution techniques have a higher chance of success in democratic states than undemocratic ones. Nonetheless, it may be regarded as a common norm that democracy will conventionally evoke normative commitment to peaceful resolutions to conflicts and disagreements. Heads of states in democratic nations are more likely to avoid wedging war against other states that they regard to be democratic and likely to embrace dialogue and other available means of resolving conflicts. Leaders in this position may consider it irrational to go to war without pursuing other conflict resolution techniques as this may jeopardize their chances of being reelected. Moreover, heads of state may consider interstate war to have detrimental consequences on the political regime , as there are chances that a leader can easily fall from power in the event of a lost war, especially in democratic states. Criticism of Democratic Peace Theory It has been contented that the democratic peace theory is widely misinterpreted, and this is largely attributed to cultural bias, or is limited to the Western cultural area that is relatively narrow (Milner, 1992)Additionally, according to Milner (1992), it is argued that essentially democracy does not create peace, but the reality is vice versa, where peace leads to creation of more democratic governance. A foremost rejection to the Democratic Peace Theory was probably that presented by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist No. 6, where he stated: “Sparta, Athens, Rome, and Carthage were all republics; two of them, Athens and Carthage, of the commercial kind. Yet were they as often engaged in wars, offensive and defensive, as the neighboring monarchies of the same times. Sparta was little better than a well regulated camp; and Rome was never staed of carnage and conquest”. From recent research that has been carried out on this proposition, it has been acknowledged that the establishment of correlations of the factors and variables in this proposition is relatively easy, the challenge arises when causation of this variables has to be established. It is evident from the research, previews on the subject that most of the researchers and scholars have no consensus on the actual factors that make democratic states to be more peaceful. Additionally, research findings have been heavily criticized for not finding a common definition of key terms such as “war”, “democracy” and “peace”, implying that evidence will inevitably vary depending on how these key terms are defined. Recent research has also established that the democratic peace theory may only hold valid in democratic states that have achieved high economic development standards. This insinuates that those democracies with poor economic standards are likely to disregard democratic ideals and opt for war to resolve their differences, regardless of their foreign policy and impact on international relations. Conclusion Empirical evidence cannot be deemed to be entirely definitive, as the decision on whether a government will wage war against another may well be influenced by other factors outside democratic ideals. It is possible that the increase in the number of democratic states after the cold war may increase chances of new disagreements and conflict, thereby negating the democratic peace proposition that has so far garnered substantial support internationally. Nonetheless, Streams of arguments in support of the proposition are highly diverse, ranging from formal, philosophical, historical, experimental, and even psychological. As it stands now, theoretical bases that have been developed through in-depth research and numerous empirical analyses support the proposition that democracy indeed promotes peace both at domestic and international levels. Bibliography Baldwin, D. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism:The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press. Henry Kissinger. 1994. Diplomacy. Simon & Schuster: New York. Russett, B., Sterling-Folker, J., Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. 2010. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Milner, H. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics, 44 (1992), 3, 466-496. R.J. Rummel. 1997. Power Kills: Democracy as a Method of Nonviolence. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers. Thomas Friedman. 2000. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Anchor Books. Thomas Friedman. 2005. The World is Flat. USA: Farrar. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/history/1815327-does-democracy-promote-peace
(Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1815327-does-democracy-promote-peace.
“Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/history/1815327-does-democracy-promote-peace.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Empirical Evidence in Democratic Ideals: Peace at Domestic and International Levels

What Shaped Foreign Policy in the USA

Keeping in mind the fact that US has emerged as a super power in the arena of world politics and international relations after the end of the Great Wars, it is of little wonder that the process of formulating US foreign policies is complex, and with compelling influences from its various domestic agents, pertaining to its social, political, economical, and the “epistemic communities.... Various researches on the subject of US international relations have distinguished 3 specific factors that appear to exert their influences on the foreign policies of the country, especially after the end of the WWII....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Economic Development is a Prerequisite to Democratization

Regardless of how democracy is measured and when used, the relationship between democracy and the improved levels of economic development remains to be important and irrefutable.... Government and political democratic forms have been common in some specific parts of the world and less in others.... According to this theory, development in poor countries increases the chances for democratic transition....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Possibilities for peace in the international system: realism versus liberalism

Walt writes that policy-making - or making a sound policy to be precise - would be a really tough task in the present-day welter of information if one missed the organising effect of a valid theory upon his own ideas and basic principles about how the world works (1998).... ... ...
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Shaping of Agri-Food Supply Chain

Food Safety Week has provided a centre for messages designed to help people undertake fundamental precautions that decrease the risk of food borne illness.... Consumer activist groups have played a major role in informing the public about food safety issues.... .... ... ... In the precedent 15 years, the United Kingdom has practiced an enlargement in the figure and brutality of food safety incidents....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Comparative Politics

There are several approaches that are useful in Comparative Politics and the major ones amongst them are the Normative Approach and the empirical Approach.... But knowing the research involved in Comparative Politics, undoubtedly empirical Approach is not only the most suitable, but also absolutely necessary.... It emphasizes the collection of empirical data and the rigorous testing of theoretical proposition against this data.... s unanimity cannot be established in world governments, the interests and attitudes of influential groups that are running the administration in various countries have to be studied under 'Comparative Government' and for this process, there is no replacement of empirical approach....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Concept of Cosmopolitan Democracy

David Held and Daniele Archibugi, the most renowned European theorists of cosmopolitan democracy, argue that although democracy has gained universal acclaim as the best form of political establishment after fall of the Iron Curtail and end of the Cold War, it influences only domestic level, while the realm of international relations remains practically unaffected by democratic processes.... international institutions, including the United Nations organization and European Union do not care much about democratisation of their activities which results in lack of accountability and restricted public access to information....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Social Construction of Reality

'Better social ontology is thus the key to constructing more adequate sets of empirical evidence (Patomaki, 2002:99).... The empirical evidence for realism and liberalism in international relations is evidenced by many historic elements and changes that actually go in the direction of building a democratic state, and away from socialism, and especially away from communism.... This paper is a brief exploration of theories of realism and liberalism at an international level....
14 Pages (3500 words) Term Paper

Major Influences That Have Shaped Foreign Policy in the USA

This growing number of evidences of strong influence of public support in shaping US foreign and defence strategies, and international relations (Putnam, 1988, 432-436), was aptly summed by Nincic when he commented that all US foreign policies and defense strategies were 'tethered to domestic electoral calculations,' especially during the time of the elections (1990, 395).... The author states that the official goals of US foreign policies as stated by the government, are "to create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community"....
14 Pages (3500 words) Dissertation
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us