StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

NY stop and frisk policy - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Institution Instructor Date New York City stop-and-frisk policy The criminal procedure law in the New York City (section 140.50) provides for the empowerment of police officers to stop and frisk pedestrians based on suspicion. The police department in the city observes the programs of ‘stop-question-and-frisk’ through which thousands of the pedestrians are annually frisked for weapons as well as other contraband…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
NY stop and frisk policy
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "NY stop and frisk policy"

New York stop-and-frisk policy The criminal procedure law in the New York (section 140.50) provides for the empowerment of police officers to stop and frisk pedestrians based on suspicion. The police department in the city observes the programs of ‘stop-question-and-frisk’ through which thousands of the pedestrians are annually frisked for weapons as well as other contraband. The effectiveness of the policy has been observed in success by police department in seizures of such weapons as guns and such unauthorized guns as well as the minimal shootings by criminals.

However, the recent past has seen a great reaction towards the policies with the most influential one coming from judge Scheindlin's recent ruling, which termed the policy unconstitutional. According to the CNN report, the court ordered that the policy of stop and frisk be altered because in its interpretation, it was unconstitutional in that it targeted the Latinos and the minority blacks. In the judge’s ruling, the policy is a complete violation of the constitution of the land, which is against such discrimination as is entertained by the ‘stop-and-frisk’ policy.

The judge reasoned that the searches without reasonable suspicion violated the plaintiffs’ fourth amendment, which bars unreasonable searching of persons. Moreover, the case found out that the policy violated the fourteenth amendment rights which specifically guarantees equal protection and which according to the evidence presented was not observed when searching the Latinos and the black Americans only. Therefore, according to the judge, altering the policy is necessary and inevitable as this will stop propagation of the racial discrimination shown towards some races as well as ensure that stopping and frisking is based on justifiable suspicion (Tuttle and Maing, para 1-6).

Nevertheless, the ruling by judge Scheindlin that the police policy needs amendment has increasingly triggered discussions with various parties citing support towards the decision while yet others posing contrary opinions. For instance, the city officials are quoted to have held a different opinion and vowed to appeal the ruling holding that the policy has been very successful in cutting down crime rate within the city. In fact, Bloomberg (the city mayor) as well as Ray Kelly interpreted the judge’s order as disturbing and equally offensive.

The police boss claimed that the police are thoroughly trained on the matter of stop and frisk and thus refuted the proofing that it was done on discriminatory manner or without justifiable suspicion. The mayor on the other hand supported the program through statistical evidence that the tool had been applied effectively to control murder crimes up to about 50% since he took over the office (Hanna, para 1-10). With a vow on an appeal towards the ruling, much of an argument is expected with the city officials holding firm to their opinions that the program is timely and all efforts must be put towards observing it for the welfare of all the New York dwellers.

In the appeal, the officials are expected to justify their claims of effectiveness of the policy in controlling crimes and their postulation that judge Scheindlin lacks the technical capacity to understand the police profession ethics and guidelines (Pilutik, para 1-3). Socially, the majority of the victims to the discrimination caused by the policy, especially the minority blacks received the ruling with gratitude and relieve. They reasoned that the amendments would be very essential in saving them from the unfair treatment leveled against them by the police department in New York City.

Complaints from the people of color held the police department responsible for the formulation of the policy, which contravened the constitution in matters of equal treatment to all as well as frisking at justifiable suspicion. However, as the mayor and police boss reasoned, the amendment and subsequent stop of the policy would heighten cases of insecurity to all city dwellers. Security lapse within the city would have adverse effects in social economic aspects. In fact, according to a report by Pavlich, there is already a notable sharp rise in crime within the city, just a month after the ruling by the judge.

He quoted the New York Posting that the month recorded a 13% increase in shootings as well as a 17% rise in gun seizures since the ruling (Pavlich, para 1-4). In conclusion, the police department of the New York City has had great steps in crime management especially though the formulation and imposition of the policy on stop and frisk. The effects noted were in curtailing the free movement of weapons, which are associated with crime. However, a recent ruling by the court that the implementation of the program went against the constitution through targeting particular segments of the society and failing to observed suspicion policy has spark a heated debate.

Much is expected in the appeal case awaited from the New York officials who have vowed to appeal the ruling on amendment of the policy. Works cited Hanna J., “Judge rules NYC's stop-and-frisk policy unconstitutional; city vows appeal” 2013. para 1-10. Web. 2 October, 2013. < http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/12/justice/new-york-stop-frisk/index.html> Pavlich K., “Crimes Involving Guns Up in NYC Since Judge Banned Stop and Frisk” 2013. para 1-4. 2 October, 2013. < http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/09/20/crimes-involving-guns-up-since-judge-banned-stop-and-frisk-n1705289> Pilutik S.

, “Frisk Assessment: Mayor Bloomberg’s efficiency arguments about stop-and-frisk are wrong, as well as irrelevant” 2013. para 1-3. Web. 2 October, 2013. < http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/08/new_york_s_stop_and_frisk_policy_is_neither_effective_nor_constitutional.html> Tuttle R. and Maing S., “Ending Stop-and-Frisk for Good” 2013. para 1-6. Web. 2 October, 2013.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“NY stop and frisk policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
NY stop and frisk policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1487073-ny-stop-and-frisk-policy
(NY Stop and Frisk Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
NY Stop and Frisk Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1487073-ny-stop-and-frisk-policy.
“NY Stop and Frisk Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1487073-ny-stop-and-frisk-policy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF NY stop and frisk policy

Implementation of the Stop and Frisk Policy by Law Enforcement Officers

Oli Rodriguez PAD 715 John Jay College Literature Review Public Reaction to Implementation of the stop and frisk policy by Law Enforcement Officers Research Question: How does the public react to the implementation of the stop and frisk policy by the police?... hellip; The stop and frisk policy has created a lot of controversy in the New York.... The stop and frisk policy is a procedure applied by the police and involves the police stopping or detaining pedestrians while searching them and asking questions....
3 Pages (750 words) Article

New York Citys Stop and Frisk Policy

New York City's stop and frisk policy Part 1.... The stop and frisk policy that was implemented in New York City was done so under the assumption that it would work as the perfect crime deterrent, catching the crime and stopping it before it happens.... With an average of 88 percent of “stop and frisks” resulting in the release of those being stopped without issuing a ticket or resulting in an arrest (“NY 'stop and frisk' Policy Violates Minority Rights, US Constitution - Judge”) , this policy should be seen as nothing but merely a nuisance....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Is there racial profiling in nypd stop question and frisk

These distinguishing features later on became evident and stirred the feeling of hatred and apprehension.... Stereotype notions and racism makes… Color, cast, gender, financial wealth and many other factors become the core cause of racism.... Many immigrants who leave their homelands become victims of it, by the residents....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

NYPDs Stop & Frisk Practices

According to the police, it is easier to find criminals through this NYPD'S stop and frisk policy The NYPD's stop and frisk search refers to a police procedure where an officer runs his hands lightly over an individual suspected of carrying or concealing a weapon.... The NYPD's stop and frisk search refers to a police procedure where an officer runs his hands lightly over an individual suspected of carrying or concealing a weapon.... The officer runs his or her hands lightly on the outer garment of the suspect. The NYPD gets to be the… The stop and frisk procedure has been quite controversial, but it gets to be quite useful in controlling and preventing crime (Lamberth, 2011)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

What Cases Are Police Stops and Frisks Appropriate in

 … Police stop involves a less invasive arrest of an individual whereas a frisk entails a restricted search on an individual stopped by the law enforcing officers.... explains that law enforcement officers may stop individuals while investigating potential criminal behavior....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Terry v Ohio Stop Question Frisk

stop and frisk policy – New York City Police Department.... In conducting a stop and frisk, police officers are acting on a reasonable suspicion that either the officers or others are in danger of being harmed.... First, while warrants for search and seizure are the preferred way, there are times where police officers must act quickly and in such a case a stop and frisk may be appropriate.... Thirdly, a stop and frisk is appropriate when the police officer in question is investigating a reasonably suspicious behavior....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Fourth Admendment: Stop & Frisk

As such, any officer who reasonably believes that an individual might be a criminal suspect has the powers under the Fourth Amendment to stop and frisk him or her to confirm or dispel his or her suspicions.... Unlike reasonable suspicion-led stops, full custodial arrests are backed by probable cause, which may involve actual statistical possibility of crime such as the smell of illegal drugs or weapons in plain view of the officer or an admission of offense during and routine police stop and or search operation....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Stop And Frisk Policy In New York City

The paper "stop and frisk policy In New York City" discusses the policy that became the focus of crime control during the Bloomberg era in the New York City area.... hellip; The stop and frisk policy, of being stopped if a person looks reasonably suspicion is not the central issue.... he stop and frisk policy, of being stopped if a person looks reasonably suspicion is not the central issue.... stop and frisk has been in practice in policing for many years....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us