StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Philosophical reasoning - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Two women have built profound philosophies on the subject of feminism. They have both taken a journey into reasoning and logic that few people ever truly go on in search of the realities of life. Simone de Beauvoir and Christina Sommers both raise interesting points and arguments, both making clear what equity really refers to and the differences that exist between men and women…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
Philosophical reasoning
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Philosophical reasoning"

Two women have built profound philosophies on the of feminism. They have both taken a journey into reasoning and logic that few people ever truly go on in search of the realities of life. Simone de Beauvoir and Christina Sommers both raise interesting points and arguments, both making clear what equity really refers to and the differences that exist between men and women. Comparing and contrasting Beauvoir's "The Second Sex" and Sommers' "Who Stole Feminism" on their philosophical reasoning on the subject at hand has the ability to enlighten the philosophical mind joining them on their journeys.

Both Beauvoir and Sommers address the issue of feminism from a systematic or topical method in which they tackle philosophy one question at a time. Initially in "The Second Sex", Beauvoir questions first if there even is a problem with feminism. Then she goes on to ask, "Does 'woman' exist" Once she has proved and asserted that "woman" does indeed exist as an entity, Beauvoir goes on to question how "woman" is defined. While defining "woman", she opens herself up to the discovery that "man" and "woman" exist as opposites and therefore, further investigation into why this oppositeness exists is in question.

Likewise in "Who Stole Feminism", Sommers begins with observations on current western culture with, what she calls, a "new" feminist movement alive and growing. After her initial observations, she begins her systematic method of philosophy with the question, "Do women need to be saved by anything" After the introduction of this question, Sommers continues with the approach by offering various views of other philosophers who have reasoned their case regarding feminism. Beauvoir does the same as she looks to the three major topics (biology, psychology, and history) that have previously been raised with the topic of feminism.

She relates the work of various expert philosophers who have walked the road of gender issues years before including Charles Darwin's scientific theories, Sigmund Freud and Alfred Alder's psychoanalysis studies and Friedrich Engels' history of women. Sommers follows Beauvoir's topical approach, yet instead of noting her major topics concisely, she takes the approach of eliciting specific examples on how the recent feminist movement has sensationalized the problem at hand in order to be heard by legislatures and citizens, in general.

Here she begins the necessary task of philosophy by weighing the arguments on both sides of an issue. Sommers presents an argument in support of the "new" feminist movement and then she skillfully presents a rebuttal for the argument or exposes a piece of truth that was originally withheld from the public. She continues her journey throughout "Who Stole Feminism" with this type of argumentative reasoning structure.On the flip side, Beauvoir alternates her arguments back and forth, but gains more depth by constantly comparing and contrasting, making rebuttal after rebuttal to both sides of an argument.

In which case, it is difficult for the reader to entirely comprehend which side of the debate Beauvoir stands. The objectivity of Beauvoir as a philosophical writer is a strength as seen in her argumentative reasoning structure. Beauvoir and Sommers, using the philosophical systematic method, ask a series of questions that elicit reflections which produce responses from themselves. They continue in the tradition of feminist debate in their works, "The Second Sex" and "Who Stole Feminism" Each philosophical writer has their own way of examining reality; one by structure of topics, the other by specific examples.

Both writers use argumentative persuasion to receive positive results from their readers in their philosophy of thought. ReferencesBeauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. In Brannigan, M. C. Ethics Across Cultures: An Introductory Text with Readings (pp. 199-203). New York: McGraw-Hill. Sommers, C. (1995). Who Stole Feminism. In Brannigan, M. C. Ethics Across Cultures: An Introductory Text with Readings (pp. 203-207). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophical reasoning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Philosophical reasoning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1503569-philosophical-reasoning
(Philosophical Reasoning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Philosophical Reasoning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1503569-philosophical-reasoning.
“Philosophical Reasoning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1503569-philosophical-reasoning.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophical reasoning

Descartes and Dreaming

Dreaming and sleeping or not conscious thoughts, and therein lies the reasoning why they can not be proven when they... Renee Descartes was a philosopher that, although wasn't a follower of skepticism, held skeptic beliefs like any philosopher did.... He stated that sense perception had a part in what a person claimed held the validity of truth, even though they could be misinterpreted....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Scepticism versus Human Nature: David Hume, Enquiry concerning Human Understanding

Therefore, Hume suggests that attention should be on the power of human nature as opposed to abstract Philosophical reasoning.... Individuals should concentrate on this power since abstract reasoning of skeptics will always collapse when subjects to the more powerful principles of our nature....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

What does Pascal make for religious faith in the reading The Wager

?? He did not propose any elaborate Philosophical reasoning that requires higher understanding such as the explanation of St.... While his reasoning is simple, the argument of weighing the benefit of believing in God vis-a-vis negating God is sensible especially to the modern mind who often asks, “What is in it for me?... Blaise Pascal, being a scientist proposed a justification on the existence of God from a pragmatist point of… His philosophical treatise on the existence of God is famously known as “Pascal's Wager or Pascal's Gambit....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Philosophy Principles of sound reasoning

Moreover, the discussion will attempt to evaluate whether some of these tautologies are contradictory or not; a The principle of non-contradiction is a principle that is applicable in Philosophical reasoning: It asserts that it is not correct to posit that something is correct while at the same time claiming it is correct.... There are various ways through, which different people reason; basically, reasoning is usually guided by certain principles that may vary from one point to another....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Pick the most suitable and easiest to you

The Gettier problem refers to a Philosophical reasoning that questions whether something that is held to be true but is based on invalid reasons counts as true knowledge (Pollock and Cruz, 12).... philosophical Explanations.... This is a conception of knowledge referred to as the Justified True Belief that was first put forward by Plato (Nozick, 7)....
1 Pages (250 words) Term Paper

Plato as the Greatest Philosophers of All Time

In essence, the myth claims that knowledge obtained through senses is no more than opinion; real knowledge is acquired through extensive philosophical… Plato makes us think about the perception of truth.... For us to properly gain knowledge, we must therefore come out of the confinement of our senses and apply thorough or philosophical thinking into issues....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

Theology and Philosophy

The timing of these disasters cannot find any support from Philosophical reasoning.... Hence, philosophy applies the power of reasoning to understand the theological principals of faith.... Ontological approachThis approach emphasizes on the reasoning that mentioning about god means talking about some concept that exists.... Hence, god is a concept that can be proved through abstract reasoning.... ascal's Wager is a better argument as it clearly defines the reason as self-interest of people to believe in god's existence, while ontological argument is based on abstract reasoning only....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Republic by Plato

hellip; The Form of the Good is an intelligent realm that provides knowledge to understand concepts such as justice and truth through Philosophical reasoning.... For the non-philosophical minds, Plato justifies the realm of Forms when he equates the concept with mathematics, arguing that there are truths that are most definite and real and do not exist in the material world (The Republic)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us