StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Notion of Caveat Emptor - Thesis Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Notion of Caveat Emptor" highlights that generally speaking, Caveat emptor (Laidlaw v. Organ), a Latin phrase that translates roughly as “buyer beware,” describes the dominant legal relationship between buyer and seller in the United States.  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful
The Notion of Caveat Emptor
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Notion of Caveat Emptor"

While caveat emptor defines the legal relationship between buyer and seller, it does not define the ethical relationship.  As this paper will demonstrate, ethics requires a much greater responsibility on the part of the manufacturer and retailer (see Fieser 1996).

To illustrate that the ethical obligation far exceeds the legal one, we can examine the issue from the perspective of one of the ethic's most famous frameworks: the categorical imperative of Immanuel Kant (2006).  Immanuel Kant's famous categorical imperative follows/is founded upon a claim about the nature of human beings as autonomous agents, capable of determining the means by which to accomplish their tasks and goals, and who are capable of goodwill.  To this extent, humanity is an end in and of itself, in that since human beings are defined by their self-rule and their rationality, and because their knowledge of the goodwill comes from their essential capacity to reason out their own interests, every human is endowed with inherent dignity.  As a consequence, Kant made clear that moral actions are actions that are rational when extended to everyone (rather than limiting them to just one person) and that refuse to treat people as merely means to an end. 

Businesses that manufacture or sell products that may be defective (or worse) at the time of purchase are, in very obvious ways, violating the categorical imperative to treat people as an end in and of themselves rather than as merely a means to an end—the profit gained through the sale.  No doubt this business might object, noting that they do not intend for defective products to be sold, but that given the complexities of manufacturing and distribution, a certain number of defects are going to be introduced into any product line.  But the problem here is not the existence of the occasional defect, no matter how unintentional; rather the problem is the lack of responsibility (Sandel 2009) that these manufacturers have toward products that fail to survive the rigors of manufacturing and distribution. 

The incentive, the obligation, to provide tighter quality assurance (QA) controls over the process disappears.  If we took the logical consequence of this negligence, and the lack of structure incentive to correct it and treated it, as Kant suggests, as if it could be extended to a universal, we would have a consumer disaster, wherein negligence is allowed to compound over and over and the error rate climbs steadily toward 100%.  This produces a logical contradiction: allowing for the exceptional case actually logically confounds the value of that exceptional case when extended to the universal, and it does so while treating consumers as merely means toward the accumulation of short-term profits.

Perhaps, then, caveat emptor should be replaced as the normative legal doctrine by caveat venditor (McPherson v. Buick Motor Co.), or “seller beware,” which would place the onus for defective and dangerous manufacturing on the part of the seller, where it makes more sense anyway.  After all, when it comes to the propensity for damaged goods or defective functions, the retailer knows the manufacturing process and their distribution chain far better than does any consumer, who lacks access to the information necessary to make an informed decision.  As such, it makes only logical and ethical sense to place the legal onus where it belongs.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evaluate the notion of 'caveat emptor'. Does a business have an Thesis”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1422534-evaluate-the-notion-of-ychcaveat-emptoryie-does-a
(Evaluate the Notion of 'Caveat emptor'. Does a Business Have an Thesis)
https://studentshare.org/other/1422534-evaluate-the-notion-of-ychcaveat-emptoryie-does-a.
“Evaluate the Notion of 'Caveat emptor'. Does a Business Have an Thesis”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/other/1422534-evaluate-the-notion-of-ychcaveat-emptoryie-does-a.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Notion of Caveat Emptor

Consumer law, warranties and conditions

The main issue is that how can one distinguish between a condition and a warranty as there stands no general rule for distinguishing them (Grant, 2010).... .... ... ... The main issue is that how can one distinguish between a condition and a warranty as there stands no general rule for distinguishing them (Grant, 2010)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Market Share

According to the 2011 Company Report, the Coca Cola Company's products (over 200 brands) are sold and distributed to over 200 countries.... Forbes Magazine estimates that the world consumes close to 60 billion beverages on a daily basis with 27 % of this consumption being in the United States.... ...
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Paper

McDonald and the Stella Liebeck Scalding

Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Case Study: Stella Liebeck vs.... McDonald's Restaurant.... Facts: McDonald's acknowledges that at, 140 degrees Fahrenheit, coffee in Styrofoam cups posed a risk of burning the consumers' throat and mouth.... This risk established the restaurant avails burn hazards for foods served above 140 degrees Fahrenheit....
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

Laws Relating to the Liability of Vendors

he doctrine of caveat emptor -Let the buyer beware- involves the purchaser's risk to have the premises surveyed and to determine whether they are fit for the purpose intended.... Under the doctrine of caveat emptor, the buyer could not recover from the seller for defects on the property that rendered the property unfit for ordinary purposes.... It is to be remembered that the doctrine of caveat emptor does not lay down any obligation in the seller to point out the defects in goods to be sold....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

With reference to the text explain Gilroy's approach to the concepts of 'race','class' and 'nation'

Paul Gilroy in the book, There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack, provides an alternative sociological approach to the concepts of race, class, and nation, within the context of the discussion on racism in the UK.... Before presenting how Gilroy approaches these three concepts, it.... ... ... Such misconceptions, for Gilroy, result in greater problems, not to mention the aggravation of the problem on racism in the UK....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Week 12 Real Estate CD

The court ruled that, it was not the duty of the real estate agent to disclose such information because of the principles of caveat emptor.... New York at the time enacted the principles of caveat emptor in its laws (Emanuel, 2006).... I agree with this decision because under the principles of caveat emptor, the buyer should have sought information regarding the quality and value of the house....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Case Law: Mike versus Ff Ltd

he doctrine of caveat emptor –Let the buyer beware- involves the purchaser's risk to have the premises surveyed and to determine whether they are fit for the purpose intended.... Under the doctrine of caveat emptor, the buyer could not recover from the seller for defects on the property that rendered the property unfit for ordinary purposes.... But here the rule related to the ample scope of 'caveat emptor 'plays an important role in impeding the purchaser in taking the action against the vendor for the disposal of defective constructions....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Entering into a Contract in Roman Law

This study " Entering into a Contract in Roman Law " discusses the application of jus civile to this case would mean that the agreement between Albus and Brutus, as well as the agreement between Albus and Decius, would be moderated in accordance with the existing principles of civil law.... ... ... ...
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us