StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory" paper highlights labeling theory and its contribution to understanding crime. Becker outlined the three main stages by which a person is transformed from being seen as a normal person to being labeled as deviant…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.8% of users find it useful
Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory"

Introduction to Criminological Theory LABELLING THEORY Introduction From the late 1960s to the 1970s Labelling Theory was accepted as the main sociological theory of crime. Labelling theory focuses on societal reaction to crime which could range from the informal responses of public opinion or the mass media to more formal responses of police, courts and prisons. The theory suggests that crime may be heightened by criminal sanctions, stigmatising minor violations at an early age may lead a young offender into a criminal career, and sending a young offender to prison may criminalise him or her further. The theory advances that criminology should not focus on criminals as types of people, but should highlight the numerous social control responses from the law, police, media and the public that define crime. Key labelling theorists such as Howard Becker, Edwin Lemert, Herbert Mead and Stanley Cohen have attributed deviance and a criminal way of life to labelling [Carrabine et al, 2004]1. Thesis statement: The purpose of this paper is to describe the key characteristics of labelling theory by various theorists, and to comment on its contribution to understanding crime. Discussion The central question that has confronted the sociology of deviance and crime, is whether deviancy which is anti-social behaviour that breaks the laws of society, is the result of inherent characteristics. On the other hand, is it behavior that is created by the social environment into which a person is born or brought up. Are people born deviants, criminals, or does society make them antisocial by the way it treats and responds to them, is the core question. As symbolic interactionism grew in popularity in the 1950s and 1960s, a range of sociologists began to develop the Theory of Labelling, that is the “social labelling that we apply to certain people, and the way we treat them thereafter that causes and amplifies deviancy” [Slattery, 2003: 134]2 rather than any genetic characteristics that they may have been born with. Howard Becker was a leading figure in the labelling theory movement. Howard Becker’s Labelling Theory Howard S. Becker (1963) who studied the ways in which cultures and careers were completely destroyed due to negative sanctions against drug use, indicated the key part played by labelling. According to him, in research and theory building, it was essential to understand who applies the label of deviant to whom, the consequences that result on a person labelled, and the circumstances under which the label of a deviant is successfully applied. According to Becker [1963: 9]3, “social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders”. Becker outlined the stages by which a person is transformed from being seen as a normal person to being labelled as deviant. Initially, there is a public labelling, which is an informal process and which slowly leads to a public ceremony and an official definition of a person as not only acting in an odd or deviant manner but being a deviant person. Examples are the delinquent who ends up in court and is sent to prison as a criminal; the drunk who is diagnosed by a doctor or psychiatrist as an alcoholic, or the mentally disturbed person diagnosed as schizophrenic and sent to an asylum for treatment. The second stage is that once these labels have been applied, they become the master label and dominate over all other symbols and statuses that the individual had held previously, such as father, friend or employer. Since other people see the person in a totally new light, they react very differently usually by rejecting, isolating and castigating him or her as a deviant and someone with whom they no longer have a relationship. This results in such examples as the alcoholic who ends up homeless or the ex-convict unable to secure a job or buy a house [Slattery, 2003]4. The third stage in Becker’s outline is that the rejection invariably affects the individual’s self image or perception of himself. Many respond by living up to their deviant label, by becoming deviant or adopting a deviant lifestyle or even a deviant career. Examples are a juvenile delinquent who becomes a professional criminal, the drug-user who becomes a junkie and a drug addict. These individuals often withdraw from the mainstream, go underground and live alternative lifestyles, “seeking support and status among fellow deviants in deviant subcultures” [Slattery, 2003: 135]5. In this way, a cycle of labelling can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Other Important Theories of Labelling Becker’s labelling theory which is considered to be of an orthodox nature, evolved into the theory of moral panics, social constructionist theories, and theories of social control. Stanley Cohen (1972) developed the theory of moral panic from the labelling theory. He focused on one of the first major youth phenomena in the United Kingdom in the 1960s. This was the rise of the so-called mods and rockers. The two groups clashed with each other, causing increasing concern to the public and law-enforcement agencies. The theory of moral panics refers to the exaggerated responses of control agencies, such as the media in stirring up concern and anxiety, and thereby causing more incidents of a similar manner to occur with increasing frequency [Cohen, 2002]6. Another theory that has emerged from the labelling theory is that of social constructionism. This sociological approach to criminology argues that conditions must be brought to people’s notice in order to become social problems. Closely associated to Becker’s notion of moral enterprise, this theory highlights the ways in which individuals, groups and societies label certain phenomena as problems and others then respond to such claims. Examples are the drink-driving problem and that of child victims. Labelling theory also enables an increased understanding of social control, need for policies of decriminalization, deinstitutionalization, and the creation of social movements related to such activities [Carrabine et al, 2004]7. George Herbert Mead (1863-1931) adapted the labelling theory to symbolic interactionism or social constructivism. That is, the identity of a person and his social role are both socially constructed. They do not exist ‘objectively’ separate from social life and culture. Herbert Mead observed that many children steal but few become professional thieves; conversely, most do homework, but few become real scholars. Differences in talent and opportunity are important. A youth who is caught and punished repeatedly for theft may come to be known as a thief, whereas one who gets away does not. Having the identity of ‘thief’ may close some doors, making it harder to find a job. Accepting the label for oneself may reduce inhibitions about stealing in the future. That is, the identity of the person and the social role of ‘thief’ in this case, are both socially constructed [Calhoun, 2007]8. Lemert (1951, 1967) argued that strong and negative responses to minor deviances such as truancy or under-age drinking which are otherwise commonly accepted, can cause bitterness. This can lead to increased manifestation of the same activities and the seeking out of people who condone these behaviour. “So the response to initial deviance can set in motion secondary deviance, by which an individual engages in repeated norm violations and begins to take on a deviant identity” [Lemert, 1967: pp.40-41]9. The development of secondary deviance is an application of the Thomas theorem which states that situations defined as real result in similar consequences. The differences between primary and secondary deviance in Lemert’s theory given above, forms the distinction between original and effective causes of deviance. Primary deviation arises from many sources but impacts the status and psychic structure of the individual only to a marginal degree. On the other hand, secondary deviation refers to the ways in which stigma and punishment can actually make the crimes or deviance become centralized in the individual, changing the psychic structure, producing related social roles and affecting self concept. These have far-reaching effects. Lemert argued that rather than seeing crime as leading to control, it is essential to see the process as one in which “control agencies structured and even generated crime” [Carrabine et al, 2004]10. Conclusion This paper has highlighted labelling theory and its contribution to understanding crime. Becker outlined the three main stages by which a person is transformed from being seen as a normal person to being labelled as deviant. These are public labelling, domination of the master label over other symbols and statuses of the individual, and rejection of the labelled individual from the mainstream. The other important theories of labelling discussed above are by Cohen, Mead and Lemert. They are the theory of moral panic, symbolic interactionism, social constructionism, and the development of secondary deviations from primary deviation. Thus, it was found that if a person is labelled as a deviant, they ultimately become one, and live up to their image as a deviant, master criminal or mad man [Slattery, 2003]11. Bibliography Becker, H.S. (1963). Outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press. Calhoun, C.J. (2007). Contemporary sociological theory. The United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing. Carrabine, E., Eganski, P., Lee, M., Plummer, K. & South, N. (2004). Criminology: a sociological introduction. London: Routledge. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics. Great Britain: Routledge. Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Slattery, M. (2003). Key ideas in Sociology. London: Nelson Thornes. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory Coursework, n.d.)
Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory Coursework. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1719298-introduction-to-criminological-theory
(Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory Coursework)
Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory Coursework. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1719298-introduction-to-criminological-theory.
“Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory Coursework”. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1719298-introduction-to-criminological-theory.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory

Sociology of Crime: Learning Theory

The control theory focuses on the conformity that an individual goes through that may cause them to engage in criminal acts.... The control theory has to do with how much restraint a person is willing to put on him or herself to avoid partaking in criminal acts.... The labeling theory states that once a person is labeled a criminal, and...
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Labeling Theory, and Monster: Biography of an L.A. Gang Member

Scott's book can be seen from the perspective f labeling theory, which is a social control theory that states deviant behavior will perpetuate itself based on preconceived notions and perceptions of deviance (Becker, 2000).... In looking at labeling theory as it applies to Scott, control theory comes into play, but perhaps the most interesting facet of the study of deviance relates to labeling theory.... Labeling theory has much to do with the current mass-media concentration on racial and age profiling among law-enforcement officers....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Juvenile Delinquency

Understanding Crime: Essentials of criminological theory.... introduction to Criminal Justice.... Although there are many theories that can be used to explain delinquent behavior, this paper will use the routine activity theory to explain the behavior of John and show how it relates to his behavior.... outine Activities TheoryAccording to this theory, people commit crimes when chances for committing crime present themselves (Siegel 123)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Gang Crime and Related Theories

From this… In Britain, gang crime has been an issue since time immemorial for lower class neighborhoods, and despite numerous attempts from law enforcement agencies and related There are three theories that have come into being that may enable one to achieve this endeavor namely, left realism, right realism and labeling theory.... Using this theory, it can be argued that gang crime is only enhanced by the restrictive measures that are put in place by the correctional facilities and government policies that are made as these individuals join in the prisons and form alliances that continue once they are released....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Classical Theory of Crime

In the paper “Classical theory of Crime,” the author discusses the theory, which holds that crime is a result of people's normal decision-making in which a person chooses crime as a better alternative over other available alternatives to achieve the desired goal.... The theory explains that people who commit crimes do so with the belief they will never get caught.... The theory uses this notion to assert that criminal acts with painful results are avoided and those with pleasurable results attract criminals....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Criminological Theories

These theories cover the creation and the breaking of the law, criminal and unexpected behavior, as well as trends of criminal activity (Akers & Sellers 1). One criminological theory… hat applies to a teenager boy who cannot find acceptable ways to live the life he desires and thus chooses crime to satisfy his desires is the deterrence and rational choice theory.... This theory states that human beings are rational and so a crime is committed; as a result, of Before people commit crimes they have weighed the benefits and consequences of the act and since the teenage boy cannot find other better ways of satisfying his wants, so chooses burglary....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES

The target group in this context involves the Kansas University students that are likely to be influenced into alcohol abuse and other activities, especially… This kind of behavior can be linked to the social learning theory of criminology that explains on people committing crime through the people they are associated with (Siegel 229).... This kind of behavior can be linked to the social learning theory of criminology that explains on people committing crime through the people they are associated with (Siegel 229)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Criminological Theory

This discussion “criminological theory” will mainly focus on understanding the key features of cultural criminology in a detailed manner.... (2009), also seemed to have discussed about one key feature of cultural criminology concept, which has been considered as cultural criminology a mitigation tool for solving the 'social scientific' and 'criminological' issues that exist within the 'structure' along with the 'agency', associated with the crime-related activities (Ferrell & et....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us