Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The paper "Reliability of the Standardized Testing" highlights that it provides a strong foundation for the educational system, where everyone starting from the students, to the teachers, administrators and ultimately the institutions are aware of their responsibilities and are held accountable for their acts. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Reliability of the Standardized Testing"
Running Head: Reliability of Standardized Testing. How reliable is Standardized Testing? Standardized Testing is a testing methodology which not only evaluates the performance of a student, but also makes the teachers, administrators and others involved in the system accountable for the performance and also provides an evaluation of the institution itself.
Standardized Testing has been around since early 1900, however time and again, the reliability of standardized testing has often been questioned. There are both proponents and opponents of this testing system. In order to find how reliable this system is, it is quite necessary to evaluate and assess both the positive and negative aspects of this system, before reaching a conclusion on its reliability.
If we take into account the basic ideology of standardized testing, it deals with providing information about performance of individual students and also provides an evaluation of the program. In short, we can say that standardized testing makes not only teachers accountable for the poor performance of the students, but also holds the administration equally accountable for the result as well. This is quite pertinent, because the administration is responsible for providing the teachers the basic facilities in order to carry out their jobs, hence the teachers cannot be made scapegoats under this system. Hence this system does have reliability in the sense that every body involved in the education system is accountable to some extent.
The reliability of standardized testing has been put under the scanner several times in the past, in fact, as early as in the summer of 1977, at the National Consortium on testing. In this consortium it was decided to “promote a wider understanding of standardized testing among educators, legislators and public at large” (p.2). At that point itself, there was a lot of criticism from a segment of educators and administrators who felt that there had to be changes made in the system.
According to Monroe (1924), the standardized tests provided “scientific” and “standard units” (p.7) for measuring the achievements of a student. These arguments are totally valid and indicate the reliability of standardized testing. However, considering there have been enormous changes in the education system, since these comments were made. If we take the current scenario into question, we have to address a host of issues in order to answer this question. There have been a number of testing methodologies that have emerged since then, and in the current scenario, we have to take these into consideration while evaluating the reliability of standardized testing.
One of the strongest proponents of standardized testing was Atkinson (2001), who had argued that for use of only standardized tests in admission process in U.S Universities, as he believed that they were quite reliable and provided were fair. He was right in the sense that standardized tests not only provide comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the student, but also strengthen the basic foundation and principles involved in teaching.
There are may be varying opinions over standardized testing, but there is no doubt that standardized testing is quite effective efficient. The reliability has often been questioned partly due to the efficiency and effectiveness of this methodology. As mentioned before standardized testing not only evaluates the performance of student, but also tests the efficacy of the teachers, administration and the school itself. In this way everybody involved in the system is accountable and that raises doubts that people involved may get desperate and adopt illegal mechanisms, so that they are not held accountable and this is the reason why the reliability of standardized testing has been questioned.
However, the opponents of standardized education system believe that the problem with accountability is that it could cause a cascading effect; in the sense that the teachers may be influenced to design the curriculum in a way so that the students obtain better scores. This in turn could affect the efficiency of the education system. According to Haugh (1975) the opponents of standardized testing, who often question the reliability of standardized testing, point out mainly at issues of “accountability, curriculum control and efficiency” (p.2).
In my opinion, the most balanced opinion regarding standardized testing was provided by Hassett (1978), who stated that while standardized testing does provides “useful information for the class teacher” (p.1), at the same time the “test scores do not give an accurate picture of the pupil’s ability to achieve” (p.2). This is certainly quite true, standardized testing methodology does have its own set of strengths as well as weaknesses. But this is true with other methodologies as well, and in the current scenario, there are several tests such as SAT which employ standardized testing. It is a time proven methodology and although it has some drawbacks, on the whole, standardized testing is quite reliable.
Although there are many alternatives to standardized testing, they have not proved to be as effective as standardized testing. However, these alternatives cannot be dismissed altogether. They have their own advantages, there have been many suggestion of either getting away with standardized testing or making modifications, but I strongly feel that standardized form in its current form is quite adequate and does not need further modifications. It has been tested for over a century and has produced quite effective and time tested results. The reliability of the system can be gauged from the fact that arguments provided by the opponents, such as pressure on educators and administrators, are in fact the strengths of Standardized Testing. They keep the educators and administrators as well as others on their feet and are also aware of their responsibilities and consequences.
Conclusion
I would conclude with the assertion that Standardized Testing is undoubtedly reliable. It provides a strong foundation for the educational system, where every one starting from the students, to the teachers, administrators and ultimately the institutions are aware of their responsibilities and are held accountable for their acts. This is quite essential considering that under present circumstances, there is a lot of competition and in order for the students to be ready to meet the challenges of the future, and they have to be ready. In order for them to be ready to meet the challenges of the future, Standardized Testing is the most reliable methodology.
References
Airasian, P.W. (1979). The National Consortium on Testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 3.
Atkinson, R. (2001) Standardized Tests and Access to American Universities. American Council on Education. Washington, D.C.
Hassett, J.J. (1978). Checking the Accuracy of Pupil scores in Standardized Tests. The English Journal, 67, 7.
Haugh, O. (1975). The Standardized Test to Be or Not to Be. The English Journal, 64, 3.
Monroe, S.W. (1924). Written Examinations versus Standardized Tests, School Review, 32, 4.
Read
More
Share:
CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Reliability of the Standardized Testing
Phelps (2005) continues to argue that through standardized testing, school administrations are better placed to evaluate if what they assess is in line with the provisions of the policy makers of education.... This study analyzes the effects of standardized tests both on the schools and on the teaching and learning process and focuses on the meanings on test scores, and whether the increasing scores reflect the school's testing preparation practices, emphasis on basic skills, and its efforts towards renewing instructions....
The sample was also used to prove the validity of the criterion used in the tests as well as the reliability of the WAIS-IV psychological test.... The power "Psychological testing" describes that psychological testing has come under intense criticism in recent years.... Psychological testing in the field of psychology refers to the use of certain samples of behavior so as to assess issues such as the emotional and cognitive functioning of an individual....
The validity and reliability of these tests should also be questioned by both the public and the scientists and healthcare personnel that will be affected most drastically by these online studies.
... The reliability, validity and statistically analyzed data need to be better understood by both the public and physicians to ensure the person/patient is not receiving incorrect information....
standardized testing is a testing methodology which not only evaluates the performance of a student, but also makes the teachers, administrators and others involved in the system accountable for the performance and also provides an evaluation of the institution itself.
... tandardized Testing has been around since early 1900, however time and again, the reliability of standardized testing has often been questioned.... f we take into account the basic ideology of standardized testing, it deals with providing information about performance of individual students and also provides an evaluation of the program....
he reliability of oral examinations has been seen as a serious problem right from the start of research on this topic.... The paper "Analysis of Language testing" highlights that in terms of quantity, it is clearly not justified to single out oral examinations for doubts on whether the sample of language produced by the candidate provides an adequate basis for assessment.... There are a large number of possible methods of testing oral skills, some of them testing specific areas, e....
This is a very important question that needs to be answered before coming to the standardized testing format.... It is completely unjust to judge them using the standardized testing format.... It is completely unjust to judge them using the standardized testing format.... This is a very important question that needs to be answered before coming to the standardized testing format.... The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the pros and cons of standardized testing....
This paper 'Methods Used to Assess Learners Writing Ability' presents and explains a number of testing approaches and methods, and how reliable they can be in giving feedback as far as assessing the writing skills of students is concerned.... The author states that the idea of testing is among the key contributions that psychology has made to the society and tests that are developed cautiously act as a source of valuable information for making decisions in educational, clinical and a variety of other settings....
The proposal "Is standardized testing an Effective Method to Measure Student Learning?... focuses on the critical analysis of whether standardized testing is an effective method to measure student learning.... While standardized testing may offer a basis for evaluation, consideration of such factors as disabilities and special needs undermine the equal opportunity concept.... Standard testing offers a basis for comparing students' academic potentials....
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Proposal
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Reliability of the Standardized Testing"
with a personal 20% discount.