StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Democracy in America: Alexis De Tocqueville - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Democracy in America: Alexis De Tocqueville" paper argues that Tocqueville arguments though relevant to American democracy, failed to see how unequal accumulation of wealth in American societies might lead to inequalities in wealth and inhibit democracy…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Democracy in America: Alexis De Tocqueville
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Democracy in America: Alexis De Tocqueville"

? DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA Introduction Tocqueville arrived in America in 1931 exploring intellectual clarity regarding the essence of democracy, obscured from European view by the devastating French revolution violence. This voyage gave rise to Democracy in America, a critical book forming the foundation of Maneth’s research. Alexis could observe democratic revolution operating in a comprehensible and possible way. He could observe the complete sense of the democratic concept and understood its “generative reality,” the equality of social conditions. Tocqueville had lived through the French revolution and was the son of highly prominent aristocratic family where the mobility lineage went extremely far back, this could have caused a disdain for money. He was from egalitarian society not the newly formed capitalist society, so this could justify why he had a blind spot concerning capitalism and could not redress the challenges of industrial commercial system on the democratic system that strives towards the equalization of social conditions. Discussion Tocqueville ideas have had extensive impacts on the concept of penance and crime, equality and democracy. His historical background immensely influenced his democracy theories. Equality of conditions is the main point of focus of Alexis Tocqueville theories. He suggests that parity is fundamental to democracy, and absence of parity caused crime. His opponents use this dependence on the concept of equality as the central weakness. For instance, Tocqueville failed to recognize that unequal wealth accumulation resulting from capitalism could not be controlled in a democracy, which meant to have socially equalizing tendencies. The equality of situations denotes a social state where one person’s influence over another –based on the aristocratic regime- is substituted with the egalitarian notion of individual consent. In these conditions, the act of each has two main reasonable basis, public will and personal will. The triumph of consent over the impact and the advancement of human autonomy closely connected to it have critical, political and social impacts, leaving little as it was1. Alexis Tocqueville felt religious terror, when he examined the inspiring power of this historical transformation, which he observed as providential and in agreement with humanity, therefore, his examination of the democratic world somehow is an attempt to explore his fear. Tocqueville argues that, “intellectual life would be changed by democracy, just like the passion of men” p 230. In addition, under pressure from autonomy of individuals, views would be generalized, mores softened. Therefore, public view translates to the central, influential voice. Whereas individual rights controls, men’s live, the ends of man heeds into neglect. Similarly, the moral life’s content is emptied from the vessel of democracy. The desire for equality, essential to democracy, overwhelms all other concerns, and starts its powerful battle to eradicate the inherent inequalities of people. It is possible to recognize the modern society in Tocqueville’s views. What critics stress in Alexis works is the tragic, and, in fact, paradoxical, recognition that democracy is extremely natural to human beings and, if not controlled, detrimental to human nature. Allowed free dominance, this desire for equality- an egalitarian instinct- restricts democracy itself, in various ways. For instance, it limits democracy by paradoxically rebuilding a natural state, originally elaborated by critical thinkers such as Plato, Marx and Hobbes as the pre-civilized situation at the centre of democratic civilization. In addition, its spreads envy, destructive of any system; and finally, by gathering the natural autonomies of virtue and reason. Even though, Tocqueville recognized the aristocratic rule to be unfair, as it was anchored on an unnatural principle of familial autonomy, its hierarchical order still preserved room for principles transcending the individual will. The democratic system threatens to obscure all significant points that limit the sovereign individual. Whereas public opinion is crucial to democracy, it can be dangerous at times. Tocqueville stresses on democracy in his explanation about the majority tyranny. His majority tyranny asserts that, “in an egalitarian society, the majority will indispensably seek to oppress the few” p 235. This implies that the main support of public opinion will tyrannize the few. Tocqueville asserts that the power of majority is both irresistible and preponderant; it surpasses all other societal powers. He claims that the power of majority is crucial to preserve democracy; while, on the contrary, the power of tyranny, can limit democracy2. Tocqueville failed to understand that the power of majority acts to sustain capitalists in power and promote wealth inequalities between people. This is because the powerful aristocrats use their autonomy and resources to suppress and manipulate public opinion to support their schemes and put them to power. In his democratic ideas, Tocqueville fails to consider economic factors, for instance, he failed to consider capitalism impacts in his democracy analysis. Tocqueville concentrates on equality, neglects economic and capitalism factors that may have significant influence on inequalities between people. Some economic structures such as means of production may lead to social conflicts and inequalities in capitalistic societies because of exploitation of proletariats by bourgeoisie. The capitalist societies or individuals control the means of production and thus enslave the proletariat or working class. Therefore, democracy was a tool for the powerful individuals to control market forces and exploit the minority groups. Tocqueville viewed democracy as a “remarkable social condition; it was an evolutionary destiny for humanity” p 238. He centered his social ideas on equality of social conditions and social conflict and democracy relied on equality of these conditions. Similarly, democracy could not exist without equality leading of social crisis. According to Tocqueville, economic autonomy was a crucial source of freedom of Americans. He neglects the fact that this idea of economic mobility reinforces the rule of capitalism and is naturally exploitative. Tocqueville also misjudged the idea of democracy of Americans. He demonstrates American societies as an “egalitarian or democratic community of parity and opportunity” p 239. He argues that opportunity is widespread in the United States and that the poor can, through hard work and luck, rise to autonomy. He also argues that poverty and wealth constitutes semi permanent conditions, not just permanent inequality. He failed to understand that this is but just a basis of capitalism that rises to power and assume the full control over the market and means of production in commercial societies. Some critics believe that Jacksonian American society was both an egalitarianism era and the age of inequality. In fact, America was not as egalitarian as Tocqueville described it, because a better percentage of Americans were poor. Similarly, economic success was not as Alexis explained it. In other words, he overestimated the poor while underestimating the opulence of the capitalist. In addition, Tocqueville view of American democracy did not consider the inequality experience by the slaves (women and black American) in the hand of their masters, the capitalist. Many scholars argue that a society cannot be egalitarian or democratic if the majority of their population lives as slaves. Similarly, a society cannot be democratic if some of its population has no access to free market, property ownership, control of production means and access to economic decisions and choices3. To some extent, Tocqueville objected the slavery act in United State referring to it as “the closest act to American aristocracy,” (p 240) but he did not see how this could lead to capitalism and inequality. There is no doubt that Alexis Tocqueville misjudged the equality of societies in America, but in various aspects compared to European aristocratic societies, American society was undeniably egalitarian. The constitution demanded that people had to be equal, and there were less legal obstacles to economic mobility. Various American middle class individuals were of relative fortune, therefore, as compared to the modern aristocratic societies the American society was egalitarian. Experts agree that equality, though it brings enormous gains to people, paves way to extremely detrimental instincts - capitalism. It tends to separate individuals from one another and have every person think for herself. It opens souls to an inordinate crave for material gain. Tocqueville asserts that love for material gains and pressure enhances democracies due to aggressiveness and instability of such times. In addition, the aristocrats, with their tastes and demands for physical pressure met without problems and anxiety, turns their focus to other pursuits. Similarly, the democrats, on the other hand, live in an era when opportunities and fortunes are lost and won. In these conditions, Tocqueville asserts, “the needy conceive a desire to seek comfort and the wealthy thinks of risks of losing their comfort - the fortunes owner never acquire comfort without effort or involvement in anxiety” p 240. In this concept, Tocqueville idea seem incomplete, although his remarks concerning anxiety appear reasonable his argument regarding democratic attachment to wealth or material gains is highly problematic. For instance, some scholars argue that true democracies are attributed by frugality, mainly because of the tendency of equality to enhance distributive policies and facilitate the acquisition of crucial fortunes. Tocqueville is just but purely a foreseer of disaster. He suggests that better liberal democracy needs its people be politically energetic, dynamic ones concerned with their own improvement. He argues that a powerful nation must have exceptional people, and autonomy is a matter of survival. He failed to realize that his ideas are the basis of capitalism because people will struggle for domination and maintenance of their survival means by acquiring more wealth, and controlling production means. Conclusion In conclusion, therefore, Tocqueville arguments though relevant to American democracy, failed to see how unequal accumulation of wealth in American societies might lead to inequalities in wealth and inhibit democracy. Critical thinkers agree that modern societies are highly fair and dissatisfied, and are driven by an endless agitation to fulfill human needs and work to accumulate and maintain more gains that are material. Bibliography Tocqueville, Alexis de, Harvey Claflin Mansfield, and Delba Winthrop. 2000. Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“How does Alexis De Tocqueville fail to see that the unequal Essay”, n.d.)
How does Alexis De Tocqueville fail to see that the unequal Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1458862-how-does-alexis-de-tocqueville-fail-to-see-that
(How Does Alexis De Tocqueville Fail to See That the Unequal Essay)
How Does Alexis De Tocqueville Fail to See That the Unequal Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1458862-how-does-alexis-de-tocqueville-fail-to-see-that.
“How Does Alexis De Tocqueville Fail to See That the Unequal Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1458862-how-does-alexis-de-tocqueville-fail-to-see-that.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Democracy in America: Alexis De Tocqueville

Alexis de Tocquevilles Democracy in America (1835, 1840) and John Stuart Mill On Liberty (1859)

“Democracy in America,” by alexis de tocqueville analyzes the tyranny of the majority theory and its role in forming political ideology and the constitution in America.... “Democracy in America,” by alexis de tocqueville analyzes the tyranny of the majority theory and its role in forming political ideology and the constitution in America.... ? De Tocqueville's “democracy in america” and John Stuart Mill's “On Liberty,' are similar because they both have numerous legitimate concerns about the right and plight of the minority and individual in the face of a system of politics ruled by the majority....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

American Social Life

alexis de tocqueville in his book, "Democracy In America", has described various aspects of America's intellectual life, war, foreign policy, military, religion etc in the past.... The life in america in the nineteenth century was entirely different that the life at present.... This paper analyses Toqeville's account on religion in america in nineteenth century and its influences on democracy.... hellip; Since the introduction of democracy, america has developed rapidly and became the most prosperous country in the world at present....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Christianity and Democracy in America

Christianity and Democracy in America Alexis De Tocqueville Tocqueville says that during his stay in America, the state of democracy in the society was the best thing he witnessed (Tocqueville & Goldhammer 56).... He discovered the benefits and the influence of democracy in the society.... Further, democracy in the society and its influence goes far beyond the political character and the laws of America.... Consequently, democracy leads to the creation of opinions, sentiments, suggests ordinary practices of life, and modifies what it does not produce (tocqueville 5)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Women in America

The essay "Women in america" deals with a comparative study of the similarities and differences in the works of Friedan and Goldman.... However, the compare them to the opinions recorded by DeTocqueville on gender relations in america and Europe.... hellip; Friedan's work became popular especially in the mid-twentieth century among women, as it became identified with the feelings of many middle-class, non-working, 'progressive' women in the post-war period....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Tocquevilles View of American Government

orks cited“The alexis de tocqueville Tour Exploring Democracy in America.... How did trocqueville describe democracy in america?... rocqueville was Frenchman who came to America in the early nineteen century to study about American people and democracy, and later wrote a book called “democracy in america.... He had a huge impact on the politicians because of his best-known work, democracy in america, and his philosophies were enough to influence others....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Alexis De Tocqueville and Democracy in America

Moreover, after Tocqueville returned to France, he read a couple of documents that reflected on his trip and revealed in Western Alexis De Tocqueville and Democracy in America Alexis De Tocqueville was a young aristocratic lawyer born in France and visited the United States in 1831.... urthermore, concerning democracy in america, Tocqueville had vivid impressions on the equality of conditions that he saw in the United States.... democracy in america....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville

This book review "Democracy in America by alexis de tocqueville" presents a French politician regarded as a historian.... In 1935, the documentation of his American tour was published under the name De la Democratie en Amerique, translated as democracy in america.... In this book, tocqueville notes that democracy would solve most of the social problems facing aristocratic nations.... tocqueville saw that democracy supported the equality of every individual in a community....
5 Pages (1250 words) Book Report/Review

Summary of Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville

The paper "Summary of Democracy in America by alexis de tocqueville" discusses that Tocqueville observes that American legislation is biased towards the rich.... alexis de tocqueville's “Democracy in America”Tocqueville's observations that are no longer relevant to American societyIn Tocqueville's observations on American society, he established the role of Puritans in setting up the America's democratic ideals of equality.... n the book “democracy in america”, Tocqueville also blames the lack of press power on the decentralization of American Press....
2 Pages (500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us