StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments" speaks of a balanced application of The just desert theory and other concepts of criminal justice for punishment that is adequate to the crime committed, regardless of origin and social status of the criminal…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.2% of users find it useful
The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments"

Download file to see previous pages

The Just desert model suggests that retribution justifies punishment because individuals deserve what they received for past deeds. Under the just desert theory the punishment should be the same for all people who commit the same crime. But the idea is that does just desert punishments stops the offenders to repeat it again Has it created the peace balance in the society and is it beneficial for us in general Is the Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation wrong In a research (Kevin M.

Carlsmith and John M. Darley and Paul H. Robinson; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, Vol. 83, No. 2, 284-299) they came to know people are in favor of deterrence at macro level, but when it comes to individuals, people favor just desert because they consider it right and wrong doers deserve it. "The task of a just deserts theorist, then, is to assess the magnitude of the harm and to devise a punishment that is proportionate in severity, if not in kind. Kant (1952) recommended censure proportionate to a perpetrator's "internal wickedness," a quantity that may be approximated by society's sense of moral outrage over the crime".

After researching for quite sometime, I came to know that many are in favor of just desert. They suggest that just desert results in social Control. When there are established criminal justice punishments in society and people know the degrees of punishment they will have to suffer if they committed any wrong deeds, people tend to think before doing anything. Because they are aware of retribution, and they know that punishment will be same for all levels of people without being bias, they feel just and are less likely to commit serious crimes.

But some argue that being blind to class difference doesn't lead towards just. Ehrlich (1938: 363) pointed out that the more the rich and poor are dealt with according to the same legal propositions, the more the advantage of the rich is increased'. Galanter (1975: 363) puts it more beautifully. "The sailor over board and the shark are both swimmers, but only one is in the swimming business". Geertz (1983: 217) says that "there are number of facts about the way the world works, mostly facts about the distribution of power, which prevent punishment being imposed on the most deserving of it.

A policy of attempting punishment of all those who deserve it (and who can be caught) has the effect of increasing injustice, worsening tendencies to punish most where desert is least. This is because for the tendency for the law to be 'the most powerful where least needed, a sprinkler system that turns off when the fire gets too hot'." Some argue that the theory is fair to the offender if the punishment fits the crime; same punishment of all offenders for the same crime, etc which give people the sense of just.

People know that it does not authorize selecting a criminal for particularly cruel punishment by random drawing, even if this would expend fewer overall social resources than imposing lower and proportionate punishment on all similar offenders, which is referred to as the consequentiality theory. Another benefit is that in just desert, people are punished according to the seriousness of the crime.

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments Term Paper, n.d.)
The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments Term Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1501853-just-desert-essay
(The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments Term Paper)
The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments Term Paper. https://studentshare.org/law/1501853-just-desert-essay.
“The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1501853-just-desert-essay.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Just Desert Theory and Other Views on Punishments

Basing Sentencing on Retributive Principles

Critics of retributive principles take utilitarian views to support their argument.... The retributivist theory which was thought to be dead has now come back alive and so has the arguments around the theory.... The retributivist theory does not look into the future but is only concerned about the crime committed in the past....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Justification of Punishment against Offenders

Although restorative justice in itself has not been shown to minimize crime, it has been helpful in bringing a relative relation between the victim and the offender and what punishments are best suited to fit the criminal actions of an offender as well (Strang 2005).... However, to some in society this is a positive attribute being added to the judicial system and to others (especially law enforcement personnel) it is neglecting the proper way to control and combat crime as there are those in the judicial system that still feel severe punishments are justifiable for certain criminal actions and therefore should be continued in order to properly control crime (Goulding 2005)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Is Crime a Psychological Defect

Each of these undesirable elements is like people fighting each other to gain control of the ego or sense of individual existence; which is why some people become greedy, lustful, paranoid because of jealousy, and dependent on others because of laziness.... other social theories of crime include labeling, social disorganization, and critical theory.... Each of these theories differs from each other because they focus on specific or individual factors that result in a criminal act....
17 Pages (4250 words) Term Paper

Retributivist and Utilitarian Theories for Justification of Criminal Punishment

A judge might, for instance, attempt to determine whether a punishment is justifiable by considering the likely consequences of carrying out punishment and whether such a punishment would produce the greatest balance of happiness over unhappiness, as compared with other available options (Corlett, 2008, p.... Before examining which theory is truer in the modern world, or how the theories might be reconciled if need be, an explication of what exactly each theory states is necessary for an understanding of how criticisms might arise in the philosophical debate....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Strengths and Weaknesses of Retributivism

The author of the "Strengths and Weaknesses of Retributivism" paper states that people should be accorded a fair charge in avoiding punishments especially if they chose not to do wrong.... nbsp;… The retributivist theory has been applied to various punishment institutions all over the world.... Arguably one of the reasons for criticizing the theory is based on the fact that it does not give enough reasons for why offenders deserve the punishment that is usually harsh....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Differences and Similarities of Theories of Punishment

Religious views also consider retribution as revengeful and unacceptable.... In other words, people should be paid back with their deserts.... He gives an example of two people who need promotion in an organization; one person (Worker) has given his best to the company while the other one (Slacker) has given his least to the company.... Opponents further pose the question of whether factors other than past performance could determine what one deserves....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Arguments for Penal Reform

This paper "Arguments for Penal Reform" focuses on the fact that Ward and Salmon argue that the history of the modern penal system lies in discipline and punishment as perceived by society.... This paper is a critical analysis of the penal system, especially for law offenders.... nbsp;… There is a consideration of the theories of punishment, which gives a wider perspective of punishment as perceived by society....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Concept of Restorative Justice

Although restorative justice in itself has not been shown to minimize crime, it has been helpful in bringing a relative relation between the victim and the offender and what punishments are best suited to fit the criminal actions of an offender as well (Strang 2005).... However, to some in society this is a positive attribute being added to the judicial system and to others (especially law enforcement personnel) it is neglecting the proper way to control and combat crime as there are those in the judicial system that still feel severe punishments are justifiable for certain criminal actions and therefore should be continued in order to properly control crime (Goulding 2005)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us