StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

International and Members of the International Court - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper describes the American system of proving culpability. A criminal will remain a criminal whether tried in the local or international court, these cannot change. There should be empirical evidence that links the group with the alleged criminal activity…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
International and Members of the International Court
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "International and Members of the International Court"

US and Saudi Extradition conflict Well, in this case, there is need to create a basic ground within which the decision will be freely and justly be made for the alleged criminals to be tried in the US owing to the fact that their supposed role for indictment offended the Americans. In my first argument, I support the fact that they should be tried according to the American system of proving culpability. First, a criminal will remain a criminal whether tried in the local or international court, these can not change. Second, there should be empirical evidence that links the group with the alleged criminal activity and that is agreeable that it‘s against the fundamental human rights and ethics as perceived by both US and Saudi government. In that sense, the Saudi will be obliged to eat a humble pie and accept any form of arbitration as long as it’s sound and appeal to logic in equal measure. It is the hope of every country that acts of aggression should be strictly and stringently dealt with as the compromise the cordial relationship that exists between countries (Pyle 124). The provision for the law is such that any culpable individual can not escape the wrath. It is therefore still better if the US want to take the initiative of subjecting the suspects to a trial. The sentiment of the Saudi government through their minister for defense can be lawfully interpreted as giving the suspects a feeling that either they are not responsible for the alleged crimes or that in the event that they are, then the US government has moral and legal authority to adjudicate on the matter. There may be no established structures within the US and Saudi government which clearly indicates the channel that should be pursued in such a case, and that it entirely depends on the good will of the Saudi government to surrender the suspect which in this case are their citizens to be tried in a foreign land. The prosecution in pursuit of the American system become appreciated on grounds that they are the complainant, just on this fact, they have the moral authority to try the suspects using their jury. On the other hand, the Saudi government may be right as giving another country a lee way to try citizens of your country is an act of surrendering sovereignty to foreigners. In the light of sovereignty, the Saudi government are legally in order to avert possible extradition of her citizens for a trial through a system they cast sufficient doubt in. the fact is even accentuated by the fact that no legal extradition arrangement exist between the two countries. In the event of extradition, it is legally proper that there should be a formal and effective arrangement that provides for course of action in the event that such is necessary (Stanbrook, Ivor, and Clive 97). The Saudi defense minister then is much within the provision of the law to hesitate extraditing Saudi citizens for US based arbitration. The US is thus bound to accept the Saudi system and ensure that justice prevails in consistent with the system in place. Sovereignty to a nation is regarded as one of the most essential and fundamental attribute that a nation can be proud of. The sovereignty to a nation is universally applause to entail capacity and legality of a nation constituted of a defined territorial frame to exercise degree of authority internally and domestically as well as those extended to the international borders. Within this defined territorial entity, there has to be a permanent population within which authority is exercised. In the determining the sovereignty of a nation, the United Nations assembly considers three cardinal issues; the territory, the people and the government. With regard to the factors that are considered by the United Nation, certain factors associated with the territory do not really play significant role in the determination of sovereignty. These factors include the degree of remoteness of the territory, the size of the population, the size of the territory and the nature of law that exists in the territory. Sovereignty of a nation is thus synonymous to it’s independence in making concessions that are deemed fit by the government in place to further the prosperity and well being of the people who are encompassed by the territory. Such territories that are known to be sovereign are not bound by any law to find it admissible or fit to be a party to any of the international association or bodies that exercise and wield authority thereafter joining (Baylis and Steve 145). The countries become free to evaluate the concept that relates them to other nations before being a party to such. For instance, the international court situated in Hague is bestowed with arbitrating crimes that are considered international and members of the international court consent to the stipulated writings that governs the court as at the time of its establishment. Whereas sovereign states enjoys some undisputed rights and privileges, they are bound to work in tandem with other nations to constantly solve the ever emerging economic or political problems within them (Baylis and Steve 145). . Just like in the analogy of the law of nature that there is no man who can survive alone, nations also vulnerable to this, though not legally obliged to rise to the need of other nations, whether to lend a helping hand or not is the discretion of the individual countries(Krasner 98). These countries can only be in a position to assist when by offering the assistance they are not going to inflict any harm to themselves or cultivate enmity to other nations by supporting an act of aggression by assisting a rival country in furthering their own interest within another country. It must then not be misconstrued that a nation can assist another nation in terms of military support; the extent of assistance is not limited military support just like it can be advance in the time of certain distress like famine, natural disasters and pestilence, military assistance too can be advanced (Fowler, Michael, and Julie 132). Those falls within the moral assistance that sovereign nations can be involved in. Works cited Baylis, John, and Steve Smith. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. Fowler, Michael Ross, and Julie Marie Bunck. Law, power and the sovereign state: the evolution and application of the concept of sovereignty. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, 1995. Print. Krasner, Stephen D.. Problematic sovereignty. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000. Print. Pyle, Christopher H.. Extradition, politics, and human rights. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001. Print. Stanbrook, Ivor, and Clive Stanbrook. Extradition: law and practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“ESSAYS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
ESSAYS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1590790-essays
(ESSAYS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
ESSAYS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1590790-essays.
“ESSAYS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1590790-essays.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF International and Members of the International Court

Effectiveness of International Courts and Tribunals

s of 2006 about 102 countries were a part of the international criminal court, all NATO members except turkey and two members from the UN Security Council France and the United Kingdom.... (Albert Schweitzer, np, 1960) It is imperative to understand what the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda is.... Despite the measures left behind by British military tribunal, all international and especially Americans did not practice separate hearings for matters in which guilt has been established....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The International Court of Justice: Functions and Jurisdiction

This essay will address the basic functions and the jurisdictional nature of the international court of Justice.... nbsp;   This essay will address the basic functions and the jurisdictional nature of the international court of Justice.... This is because countries have been known to reject the rulings of the international court of Justice, and there is no real enforcement mechanism to enforce its rulings outside of the goodwill of the involved countries....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

World Court of Justice

ddressing the plenary session of the UN General Assembly in 1999, the then President of the international court of Justice, Judge Stephen M.... This court served as the immediate predecessor of the international court of Justice.... The functioning of the international court of Justice is determined by the conditions it claims to regulate and also its composition.... ne of the main responsibilities of the international court of Justice is advisory opinion....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Role of the International Court of Justice

This court was established to fulfill the objectives of the United Nations, which involved bringing to end international… This is in conformity with the principles that guide the international law and justice.... This court was also established for purposes of settling international disputes, or conditions that would have lead to a breach of peace.... This court is also responsible for giving advisory opinion regarding legal issue brought forth before the court by authorized UN and specialized agencies, i....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Why has it proved so difficult to create an effective International Criminal Court

The existence and operation of the international Criminal Court (ICC) is one of the issues being disagreed upon by member states.... Disagreements surround charges taken to it and how it only handles cases from some states and not from others and especially those holding the veto power, leading to it lacking the impartiality necessary in a court of justice.... The fact that the operation of the court from its inception seems to be controlled by a few members has brought about more questions than answers, and led to creation of issues of mistrust of the so called justice being sought in the court....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

International Business Law

This work called "International Business Law" focuses on the case within the jurisdiction of an international court of justice.... It is not clear to the court that no other country has ever tried to intensify its activities in the space.... Therefore, the court orders country X to remove its flag from the space and not to claim ownership of the area they have annexed.... The court is just to order that the country needs to make their activities transparent to the world....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Human Rights and International Criminal Court

hellip; the international Criminal Court was and still is a unique court that is treaty-oriented, independent and designed to be permanent.... This coursework "Human Rights and International Criminal court" researches and discusses the circumstances surrounding the formation of the ICC, its objectives, successes, failures, and adequate examples of cases and developments that either catalyze or deter any of these factors.... The founding countries intended to create a court that tackled complicated and gruesome international offenses, especially genocide, serious violations of basic human rights, war crimes, and crimes of violence....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Can International Courts Provide Effective Enforcement Of International Legal Instruments

The paper will further identify two case studies to give a glimpse of the effectiveness and failures of the international court in the case of ICJ.... By appealing to higher ideals of a nations psyche, the nations may be forced to aid in enforcement of international courts judgments as members of the international community.... Whereas recent developments in the larger society reflect an awareness of the necessity for effective international law, and especially in the ability of the international courts to enforce international legal instruments, evidence from various case studies suggest that various impediments and problems must be overcome before the society gets a fully functional international legal system....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us