StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Legal Defenses in International Law and Practice - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Legal Defenses in International Law and Practice" states that the plaintiff is exposed to vague avenues in seeking compensation for the breach of the contract. The defendant is adequately covered by the sovereign immunity doctrine and is able to pursue it in any legal proceeding…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Legal Defenses in International Law and Practice
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Legal Defenses in International Law and Practice"

Open Memo Assignment Introduction With the intention of providing assistance for the host government and its money-making entities above the home government and its complainants in jurisdictional struggles, definite legal defenses have developed up in and about international law and practice weighing in favor of the host government or its private defendants fighting back foreign jurisdiction in certain situations (Wallance 3). When a foreign government is directly involved in a jurisdiction lawsuit, one of three main defenses may be available to it or to a private defendant; ‘Act of state’, ‘sovereign immunity’ or ‘sovereign compulsion’(Wallance 4-7). These defenses have led to conflicts hindering foreign relations resulting to passing of blocking statutes in some states by some nations, for instance England, France, Canada and Australia. In the breakthrough verdict of, United States versus Aluminum Company of America, the second circuit apprehended that U.S courts have substance matter jurisdiction on antitrust action committed abroad it exaggerated, and was intentionally projected to affect trade in the United States. This resolution is the foundation of implementation antitrust laws on the global scale (Wallance 8). Act of State An act of state, is articulated in Underhill versus Hernandez, is the principle that, “…..the courts of one country will not sit in judgment of the acts of the government of another done within its territory”. Regardless of this ruling, there have been various attempts to make exemptions for cases where the government itself is engaged in the commercial activity in question. The grounds for such exemptions are not clearly leading to inconsistences in court practices. For instance, in International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers versus OPEC, a commercial activity was dismissed on the basis of the act of state. This necessitated the courts to differentiate amongst sovereign immunity, which scrutinizes the nature reasonably than the drive of the state doings, and an act of state, which concentrates on the drive of the acting state (Wallance 17-37). Though distinguishable on the grounds of the presence a pure contract, the contrary of this doctrine was upheld in Alfred Dunhil of London, Inc versus Cuba, where the court held that the act of state principle did not apply to a foreign sovereign acting in a commercial capacity. In seeking to enhance understanding of this principal, The United State supreme courts stated that,’…act of state issues only arise when a court must decide,-that is, when the outcome of the case turns upon- the effect of official action by a foreign sovereign. When that question is not the case, neither is the act of state doctrine’. This principal has resulted to conflicts in ruling in most instances resulting to wide criticism with many arguing it should be abolished all together (Wallance 45-68). Sovereign Immunity This international law principal stems from the unconditional immunity for the conduct of anindependent state to one for a more limiting interpretation. It seeks guidance on what constitutes commercial activity. The definition was enhanced in the case of Republic of Argentina versus Weltover, In which the court stated that, ‘……when a foreign government acts not as a regulator of a market, but in the manner of a private player within it’…then such a state will be considered to be a commercial entity in legal terms. The consequences of such an occurrence are imposition of significant penalties or the denial of specific substantial benefits along with the unprecented restrictions (Wallance 89-112). Discussion This paper recognizes that the globalization of the economy and the complexity of international economic transactions cannot accommodate the application of the above doctrines in a rigid manner. It also acknowledges that jurisdictional requests must differ somewhat among unlike subject mattersthus; an exercising state is a constituting element of an act in a legal battle. Intangible effects such as economic injury are important considerations regardless of the invocation of principle requirement (Wallance 204-378). United States has the longest history of extraterritorial conflicts enforcements and most of other approaches to extraterritorial dispute handling stems from United State practice. In Lodos case, invocation of act of state doctrine requires the evaluation of the purpose of the company activity. This involves two dimension; purpose from Lodos point of interest and purpose from Alphas point of interest. It is evident that Lodo Company is a commercial entity from the description of its construction of oilrigs. Its motivation on the negotiation stage is profit making. This is accordance to commercial entities core motive. The contractual agreement of Lodo company are pure and in accordance to business contract requirements (Wallance 317-456). With the government owning more than half of the Alpha company stock, it conduct is that of commercial descriptions in relation to business contract. This act is thus applicable by the plaintiffon the basis that the defendant is not an independent state rather than it is a commercial entity. This is in relation to the ruling in Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc versus Cuba where the court held that with sovereign nation acting in a commercial capacity, act of state doctrine is not applicable in its defense. The motivation behind the actions of a commercial entity, are completely different from the motivation behind the action of a sovereign state. On the basis of this ruling, the plaintiff has an avenue for legal case inspite of recognition of Taralas a country as a sovereign state by international bodies (Wallance 459). In relation to the act of state doctrine, the courts of one country are not allowed to sit in judgment of the acts of the government of another done within its territory has concluded in Underhill versus Hernandez case. This creates an avenue for the plaintiff to sue Alpha for breach of contract and trust. Absence of exit clause on the contract gives no room for Alpha to terminate the contract. Under this doctrine, the plaintiff is free to exploits all avenues in relation to past rulings in his favor (Wallance 461). Principle of sovereign immunity offers that a foreign state is completely immune as of the jurisdiction of the courts of another sovereign state. This doctrine has its roots in the Schooner Exchange versus McFadden, where the plaintiffs, claiming to the rightful owner of a French ship sought the execution of the vessel supporting their claims on international customs. Justice Marshall determined this state of absolute immunity referring on the importance of maintaining friendly relations with other nations and at the time drawing a clear distinction between an armed public vessel and private merchant vessels of foreign nations entering the United States. His decision was endorsed by the supreme courts laying grounds for absolute state immunity (Wallance 467). However, with increasing interacting activities of different nations, absolute immunity is an unfair judicial response and favors the host state. This contributes to the developing doctrine of restrictive sovereign immunity. These developments have led to international arbitrations regimes in protection of both plaintiff and defendants’ rights because of complications in exemption provision by restrictive immunity (Wallance 478). Claiming sovereign immunity will not be an efficient way of Alpha to avoid satisfactory claims. An illustration is in the case of LETCO versus ship-owners and agents in Liberia where in an attempt to find government assets to raise claim against them, the plaintiff ended up incurring four separate litigations with no favor in outcome. LETCO, a French entity had entered into contract with the Liberian government in which the Liberian government failed to make satisfactory rewards. LETCO filed a suit against the government in New York seeking execution of the contract. The Liberian government moved a motion against execution of its property arguing that collected by the government, its assets and taxes were in contract with the citizens, which constituted its assets as sovereign and not commercial. The ruling was made in favor of the Liberian government (Wallance 502-507). In the case of sedelmayer versus Russia, a dispute emerged between Germany and Russia after sedelmayer, a German company worn an award amounting to 2,350,000 dollars in the Russian federation. Sedelmayer compensation however required him to locate more than one asset in Russian state enforcement, filling multiple claims in order to bring the award into satisfaction. The plaintiff located the use of German airspace by the Russian as the grounds for the awards. When brought before the courts, they courts denied the execution, ruling the award was immune because they were intended for sovereign, not commercial purposes. In clarity, the judge explained that usage of German airspace by the Russian was a matter of sovereign purposes and not commercial purposes. In the manner as the earlier ruling in LETCO case, the defendant was given immunity as a sovereign state (Wallance 701). As evidenced in the above two scenario, sovereign immunity is a wide principal leaving a wide are for a state to be awarded absolute immunity in matters relating to government transactions. In our case, Alpha Company though acting as a commercial entity is able to invoke the principle of sovereign immunity through arguing that, though the government owned more than half of the stock in the company, government actions were in contracts with it citizens as observed in LETCO case (Wallance 708). Where the government actions are in contracts with its citizens, it means that all its activities including, profits, economic stability, business contracts, taxes among others are sovereign. Thus no legal is above the motive behind such contracts. If the plaintiff were to be awarded in this case, the defendant under sovereign veil will require the plaintiff to identify government assets and activities from which award is to be satisfied. As observed in Sedelmayor case, all government activities and assets are sovereign in the outcome or profit generated from them is meant for the citizens (Wallance 715). Conclusion This paper concludes that, Alpha acting as a commercial entity or a government body is able to receive absolute immunity in any proceedings brought against it. According to section 1603(b), the foreign jurisdiction act, the actdoes not define whether it governs individual or company contracts between investors and sovereign nations. This creates ambiguity which leaves the plaintiff in this case scenario at the ruling of the court regarding its ability to institute claim against a sovereign state. This paper concludes that, the plaintiff is exposed to vague avenues in seeking compensation for the breach of the contract. The defendant is adequately covered by sovereign immunity doctrine and is able to pursue it in any legal proceeding brought against him. Work Cited Wallance D. Cythia. ‘The Multinational Enterprise and Legal Control: Host State Sovereignty in an Era of Economic Globalization’. MartinusNijhoff Publishers (2002): 3-715 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Open Memo Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Open Memo Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/law/1787682-open-memo-assignment
(Open Memo Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Open Memo Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1787682-open-memo-assignment.
“Open Memo Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/1787682-open-memo-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Legal Defenses in International Law and Practice

Structural Significance of Takeover Regulation

One considers that this practice has been challenged in many United States districts.... Additionally, the analysis proposes a means of improving the current practice.... Notably, in the United Kingdom defensive tactics by managers are prohibited, whereas, in the United States, Delaware law gives managers a good deal of room to manoeuvre.... While this regulation seemingly goes against the pervading notion that the United States judicial process favours management intervention, legal interpretation of the Williams Act notes that the law provides equal opportunity for management and the offeror to present their cases....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

The right of self- defense in international law

A critical analysis of use right of self- defence in international law.... This paper seeks to provide a critical analysis of the use of this right in international law.... international law is the primary governing rules of all nations.... Does international law adequately address the right of self-defence?... Based on this Charter, this paper shall discuss the following issue: Does international law adequately address the right to self-defence?...
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Legal Rights Before and After Arrest

Principle IV of the Principles of international law Recognized in the Charter of the Nurnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, 1950, states as follows: 'the fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him' (Principles of international law, 1950).... In addition, Principle II of the same proclaims that even if the internal law does not punish a person, the person is still liable to be punished under international law....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Changes in Legal Defence

For example, there was the case of Kenneth Parks who killed his mother-in-law and attempted to do the same to her husband.... An important aspect of this characteristic is how new legal defenses become legitimate and necessary in addition to the legal system.... This is particularly true in the case of the law that maintains order.... Throughout history there are countless examples of misuse or mistakes of the law, resulting in unjust consequences....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Criminal Defenses and Specialized Courts

However, the big difference lies in the administration of the criminal law justice system lies in the sense that Saudi Arabia's system is designed typically according to sharia law and there is no federalism of any sort as it is in America and Nigeria.... As a general rule of criminal practice, every offender enjoys a right to a fair hearing encompassed in the cherished due process of law.... Criminal law looks at the punishment of the offender rather than civil law remedy of compensation....
19 Pages (4750 words) Term Paper

Defense Principles in Murder and Manslaughter Cases

The paper also analyzes whether the law operates effectively and properly in this area of Hong Kong's law or whether any changes to the law are desirable to be applied.... Hong Kong's common law defines lawful and unlawful cases of homicide.... The essay "Defense Principles in Murder and Manslaughter Cases" talks about the effectiveness operation of Hong Kong's criminal law in murder and manslaughter cases.... The law should be repealed to specify that only when the pain is chronic pain should a physician administer lethal painkillers and evade murder charges if his or her actions result in death....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The International Tribunal for Yugoslavia

Essentially, the ICTY has used as demonstrated in Kuprekic et al national judgments for interpreting and applying treaties as well as customary international law and principles of international law.... Be that as it may, the ICTY is described as a 'bold experiment' as it is said to have three significant goals: dealing with international crimes, creating and building on international humanitarian law and documenting the horrors and advances in international jurisprudence....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Legal Rights Before and After Arrest

As a result, new and new crimes appear in the statute books from time to time, and again, the law of a land gets significantly different from the law of another geographical area, and thirdly, though an action does not violate the law in a particular country, if it violates the international law, the person again is liable to be punished.... rinciple IV of the Principles of international law recognized in the Charter of the Nurnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, 1950, states as follows: 'the fact that a person acted under order of his government or a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was possible to him' (Principles of international law, 1950)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us