StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Taxation Law and Practice: Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising - Case Study Example

Summary
"Taxation Law and Practice: Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising Case" paper argues that there is a sufficient connection between income-producing activity and converted into cash. In this case, there is one share for the partner which can be converted into cash. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Taxation Law and Practice: Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising"

Taxation Law and Practice--- Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising Case Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising assessable income for the 2015/16 and 2016/17 tax years should be ascertained from different perspectives. These include corporate residence as far as their company is concerned, their residence, source of income and income from the business. To begin with, the definition of corporate resident as enshrined under s 6 ITAA 1936 shows that Rogan Advertising is a company since it is incorporated in Australia and continues to carry on business in Australia with central control and management in Australia in as much as Stephanie and Roger are currently in Brazil. The second test is the criteria for liability to Australian tax. Stephanie and Roger are Australian residents in accordance with s 6(1) as they satisfy common test law by virtue of residing in Australia. ‘Reside’ according to s 6(1) has been interpreted in different jurisdictions in Australia to mean a person(s) residing in Australia and such definitions have been applied in cases involving IRC v Lysaght; Levene v IRC. In particular, in Levene v IRC the court observed that tax payer can reside in another country for other reasons including business or holidays without contravening s 6(1). Having revised case laws and provisions of ITAA 1936 to ascertain that the Company, Stephanie and Roger satisfy ‘reside’ clauses, the principle of ‘income from business’ is essential in the assessment of Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising of assessable income for the 2015/16 and 2016/17 tax years. In accordance with s 6-5 Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising should be advised that income from carrying on their business in Australia through the company is ordinary income. It has to be added that the law is clear on the scope of business as not all receipts from their business will constitute income. The principle in this case is that the profits from this business are clearly within ordinary course of their business in accordance with s 6-5. A clear Court argument on this matter involved Californian Copper Syndicate v Harris where the Court argued that the income was from ordinary course since the company engaged in the acquisition of mines and later selling them for a profit ---an essential feature of tax payer’s business as it is the case with Stephanie and Roger operation of Rogan Advertising either from Brazil or while they were still residing in Australia. Generally, all the amounts received by the three parties must be characterized as ordinary income in the hands of the recipients. Accordingly, Courts have held that whether or not these monies are ordinary income to Stephanie and Roger, a determination will be made by assessing the amount from the perspective of the recipient (Stephanie and Roger) as it must be income to the two persons receiving the amount. As such, a salary of $80,000 paid to Stephanie and Roger is income to the two tax payers. This position was interpreted in the case involving the Federal Coke Company Pty. Ltd. v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation where the Court judged that the amount earned by Federal Coke was assessable income since price of coal was paid to its subsidiary (Federal Coke). The case notes that any income of Rogan Advertising not distributed as salary for Stephanie and Roger, and after payment of all other expenses, is distributed in terms of un-franked dividends to Stephanie and Ronald. Based on this information, s 6-5 holds that ‘how receipt is used is irrelevant.’ In the process of determination of whether an amount was received by the two tax payers, the approach the two used the money becomes irrelevant because s 6-5 still holds that such amounts remain assessable income. This position was used when Courts adjudicated over the matter involving GP International Pipecoaters v FCT. The Courts made a consideration on the issue of taxation of income from business and whether payment obtained from the construction of a project were to be assessable in terms of capital in nature or ordinary income. While s 6-5 has provided framework for Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising of assessable income for the 2015/16 and 2016/17 tax years, s 6-10 provides that their assessable income for the same period include the amount falling outside the bracket of their ordinary income. Based on their case provided, Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising incurred amounts that are regarded as ordinary income but can be included as their assessable income basing on the provisions regarding income termed as statutory income. Breaking this point within the context of the case, Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising have accumulated different incomes as follows: Income from the business (Rogan Advertising Company) Income from the provision of services (while working with Greater Union Advertisers Pty Ltd and deliver a series of lectures over two 6 week periods at the Federal University Rio) Income from their property (leasing out their house for $450 a week) and Periodic receipts Beginning with services rendered, total amount of money Stephanie and Roger obtained from providing their services, including their stay in Brazil where Stephanie engaged in a series of lectures at the Federal University Rio is ordinary income. In as much the services rendered at the university may not be considered ordinary income as per s 6-5, provisions of s 15-2 (previously reflected under s 26(e) deem the earnings from this service ordinary income. This matter was interpreted in the case involving First Provincial Building Society v FCT. Specifically, subsections 15-2 provides an explanation on the categorizing of services offered by Stephanie as assessable income on the premise that; Your assessable income entail the amount to you of all gratuities, allowances, benefits, compensations, premiums and allowances given to you with regard to, or for in respect to directly, indirectly to services, or employment rendered by you. According to capital gains tax law (CGT) subsection 108-5(1), A CGT asset is any kind of property including the house Stephanie and Ronald stay in, which has been leased. In accordance with this common law doctrine, the house shall maintain exception status in case a resident is temporarily from the residence for a period of up to six years if the same property has been rented or leased and indefinite if owners have not leased the property. The case provides that Stephanie and Ronald moved to Brazil on 26 June 2015 for 2016 Olympic Games. From the one hand, the two intended to stay in Brazil for “unknown period, and at least until the end of the Olympic Games.” On the other hand, the case notes that they hoped they would be able to return to Australia around October – November 2016. Based on tax law (CGT) subsection 108-5(1) the two did not stay in Brazil for over years therefore the $450 a week from the leased house should be exempted. In most cases, and as it was with the case involving Lomax v Peter Dixon, CGT categorises income Stephanie and Ronald obtained from the lease to be exempted income based on the period they stayed outside the country. Section 6-5 provides that Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising of assessable income for the 2015/16 and 2016/17 tax years will include ordinary income as already elaborated based on different activities Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising engaged in for the period specified. Additionally, the study has noted, based on s 6-1- that Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising assessable income will also entail their statutory income and for this case, this involve all amounts Stephanie and Roger received but were not ordinary income as s 6-5 provided. This paper has also applied the aspect of constructive receipt rule where (s 6-5(4) & s 6-10(3)) have been applied to the case provided to help in understanding that income will be derived when the two tax payers receive it. For instance, the two tax payers ordered some income to their bank account and as much as the amount was not received it was dealt on behalf of the two tax payers as they instructed the transaction thus the law deems it received and as assessable income. In accordance with the law of propositions in the identification of ordinary income, features of earnings, salaries and savings from lease are considered assessable income. This position has been supported by ordinary income which came home to the two recipients and when it did so, it was derived from external activities (which were salaries from the business, salaries from previous employment, leasing and offering lectures). There is sufficient connection between income producing activity and converted into cash. In this case, there is one share for partner which can be converted into cash. Elaborating on the facts presented, the law has provisions that income from Stephanie and Ronald, including the personal exertion as those which consisted of their salaries of $80,000, commissions, earnings, wages, fees, bonuses, gratuities, superannuation allowances, pensions and allowances should be considered as assessable income. Such assessable income further includes the assessable income of Stephanie and Ronald in accordance with 393-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Taxation Law and Practice: Stephanie, Roger and Rogan Advertising Case

Taxation Law: Set of Legislations

An essay "taxation law: Set of Legislations" outlines that most of the countries fund their operations from revenues collected through taxation.... According to the Australian taxation law, the valued income tax influences the amount of tax that would be levied on any income earner.... The case under study, therefore, seeks to discuss in details all the legal aspects of income tax and the taxation structure that affects this type of tax.... Income tax = [Taxable Income * Tax Rate] - Tax Offsets The Tax Liability to be met by an individual is outlined by the formula: Tax Liability = income tax + Medicare levy + Medicare levy surcharge + HELP Repayment In the case of Stephanie, her taxable income is: $[25,000-(200+800+1,000+2,000) = $21,000] $21,000 - $15,000 = $6,000 Tax liability would be equivalent to; $6,000 + $20,000 = $26,000 Income tax has stipulations which give a guideline on how the taxation is carried out....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Business Law Case: False Advertising

"Business Law case: False Advertising" paper states that false advertising, in a majority of jurisdictions, is illegal.... uch a case was witnessed in Hillingdon Electricals Ltd (HEL) when they stated on their website that the price of iPods and Tablets was?... It is said that there are various forms of misleading information about advertising on the internet, but the main form is still associated with misleading pricing information.... The unjust dismissal regulation of the Equality Act 2010 is rooted in the idea of a 'fair go all round' and is meant to stop dismissals, which is 'unjust, harsh or unreasonable' and do not obey the Fair Dismissal Code The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) was passed in May 2005 and had to be executed by member countries into national law by June 12, 2007, and it was applicable by December 12, 2007....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

Taxation Law Practice

The essay "taxation law Practice" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues in establishing the allowable deductions and taxation laws applicable to Mr.... taxation law means a law of the Commonwealth or a territory imposing a tax or otherwise dealing with Australian tax.... Commercial law, trade, intellectual property, and others deal with the transactions giving rise to tax.... These charges are required under State Government law to assist in funding the fire services in each State (ATO, 2007)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Taxation Theory and Practice

This essay "Taxation Theory and practice " presents tax avoidance and tax evasion that are illegal methods of avoiding tax for any company.... Tax evasion is referred to as illegal practice for escaping tax.... Tax avoidance is referred to as the 'legal exploitation of tax regime to one's own advantage' (Azimuddin law Associates, 2013).... The examples of tax avoidance can be cited as tax deductions and modifying business structure by incorporating or establishing an offshore for a company in a tax haven (Simplified Finance, 2014; Azimuddin law Associates, 2013)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Australian Taxation Law

I n the case of Airlie property, the.... Therefore, this is a capital asset, and capital gains tax are applicable in this case (Global Property Guide, 2015).... ) The capital gains tax I this case will be net of $800,000 less the amount that John had paid to purchase the farm.... Negative gearing happens when an investor borrows money to buy a rental property and the interest paid is more than the rent received from the said property leading to a negative taxable income from the property (Australian taxation, 2014)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

The Payment to the Taxpayer in FCT versus Dixon

This work called "taxation law" describes why the payment to the taxpayer in FCT v Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540 was assessable income but the payment in Scott v FCT (1966) 117 CLR 514 was not.... The main issue that arises is the income tax being payable in one case and exempted in the other.... n this particular case, the tax commissioner was leading the case in terms of section 25 of the income tax assessment act 1936.... he main difference between Dixon's case and Scott's case is the payable tax to be held with the effect of 2 different sections of the act....
7 Pages (1750 words) Report

Income Taxation Law and Practice

The paper 'Income taxation law and practice ' is a great example of a Law Assignment.... The paper 'Income taxation law and practice ' is a great example of a Law Assignment.... The paper 'Income taxation law and practice ' is a great example of a Law Assignment.... In this case, it occurs when the final payment has been made.... In this case, it occurs when the final payment has been made.... In this case, it occurs when the final payment has been made....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Taxation Law

The paper "taxation law" is a great example of a Finance & Accounting assignment.... In the taxation law study, it is important to consider the element of personal exertion and the laws and policies that govern the field.... The paper "taxation law" is a great example of a Finance & Accounting assignment.... In the taxation law study, it is important to consider the element of personal exertion and the laws and policies that govern the field....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us